Guilty until you prove yourself innocent

$350 for the Duck meal for 2. Wines are extra, by Thatcher Wine.

Can’t say I’d personally be willing to support given his complicated past as Epstein’s former personal chef though.

11 Likes

I didn’t know about this…that’s beyond crazy.

4 Likes

Jesus. Would not support.

3 Likes

There’s no evidence that Lang knew anything about Epstein’s criminal acts. He was a servant, not a pal.

Seems like a standard term anong duck purveyors. Lots of them use it. The ducks in the Instagram post are head-on.

1 Like

If he was on the island, he knew.

Also found this real quick when searching the Epstein files.

8 Likes

5 Likes

Genuinely, what am I looking at in this pic?

If anything @mzonelli is giving APL more credit than he deserves…APL was not even at the house next door, he was firmly the inside the gates so to speak.

5 Likes

Those are people who were served interrogatories to see what information they had.

Here’s a summary of his interview with the FBI.

PERRY LANG was asked about minors. He states that he wouldn’t say minors
but there were definitely young women. PERRY LANG didn’t think something
was wrong and when EPSTEIN had women around, he didn’t think that kids were
getting exploited. … PERRY LANG was asked if he would describe ever seeing a teenager there. He states that got the college girl impression. PERRY LANG lists seeing the following girls all of whom he believed were about 19-25 years old: [redacted] …

PERRY LANG was asked if he’s had conversations or overheard conversations about young women to which he states no. He’s asked if he’s had or overheard conversations about EPSTEIN’s sexual preferences to which he states no. He’s asked if he’s had or overheard conversations about the massage to which he states no. …

PERRY LANG was asked if after leaving the job if he talked to anyone else
involved. PERRY LANG states yes that he chatted with EPSTEIN about PERRY
LANG’s business plan. EPSTEIN tells PERRY LANG that he can call EPSTEIN if
he ever has business questions. PERRY LANG has another business meeting
with EPSTEIN. PERRY LANG thanked EPSTEIN for giving him business advice by
giving him a massage therapist on one occasion. PERRY LANG sends a 35-yearold
massage therapist to EPSTEIN’s house. After the session the therapist
tells PERRY LANG that EPSTEIN tells her to tell PERRY LANG that he has a
chest full of sex toys.

Thanks for the clarification.

I don’t know anything about this entire situation, so I guess I’ll be doing some reading (in addition to all the real work I have this weekend) b/f possibly coming to conclusion for myself…

1 Like

In the one I posted? This is a still from The Zone of Interest. An incredible film if you haven’t seen, which will explain the context pretty quickly.

5 Likes

He was in the kitchen and sometimes served meals at business dinners. He was told not to talk to guests. He thought the young women around were college-age. He stopped working for Epstein around 2002. Maybe Epstein wasn’t trafficking underage girls yet, or was more discreet about it than later. The cops didn’t start investigating Epstein for that until 2005.

How do you explain this one lol

4 Likes

Epstein was fucking nuts. Perry Lang didn’t do anything odd.

rules for thee not me…

From an eater article:

“she endured happened behind closed doors, she and other young girls would often be naked in the house to the view of everyone, because Epstein “did not like tan lines.” Giuffre said there were naked girls inside and outside the house, with Lang serving them iced tea, water, and fruit platters. Palmeri says several women they spoke with remember Lang at Epstein’s properties, saying he was “very polite.”

3 Likes

Yeah, sending him a message therapist because he gave him business advice sounds super normal.

4 Likes

If you think that shit isn’t one-sided …

already deleted the comment …

1 Like

There’s no evidence that Perry Lang knew that Epstein was trafficking underage girls in 1998-2002 when he was working for him. That Giuffre thought he might have doesn’t mean he did. Presuming him guilty of something is un-American.