This is an all vegan sushi restaurant on Melrose across from the Groundlings Theatre.
I skipped the sushi. But the spring rolls were good. The fries were great. The bespoke cocktails were fine. Not sure if this is a viable formula, but who knows?
Another one
Guess it’s not a viable formula afterall lol
C’est la vegan.
Kusaki did not have a sign outside. I only knew about it because I was curious about the construction and had to google a bit to figure it out. I’m not vegan, so I wasn’t that excited about it. But leaving that aside, I do wonder if vegan sushi is viable. Not because I don’t think vegan restaurants are viable at all (I think they are), but because vegan sushi in particular is less likely to get pescatarian vegetarian-lite folks in the door (since they, presumably, like non-vegan sushi). And I don’t think vegan restaurants are viable if their only plan is to appeal to vegans. Not 100% sure they are all vegan, but Cafe Gratitude, for example, tries to at least appeal to non-vegans.
I like vegan food, but I don’t like inferior food. Substituting salmon for a carrot on the rice is inferior food. I also don’t care about fishes – their whole life consists of swimming around with their mouths open swallowing smaller fishes alive. That’s my expert analysis of this whole situation.
Yes, sounds like you are exactly the type of person who wouldn’t go to Kusaki, but might go to another vegan restaurant.
Vegan Japanese food is a proven concept, Cha-Ya has been doing it in Berkeley and SF for years. Focusing too much on sushi might be a bad idea.
All this is giving me a sushi jones. Ima have to get to Sugarfish stat.
I need to take some lessons from you on how to state opinions.