The (Big) Baby Bistro - Chinatown

The Big Baby

Tucked into the small Victorian home of the rear left corner in the Alpine Courtyard in Chinatown, Baby Bistro finds welcome fellow travelers with neighbors Perilla and Baker’s Bench with its “bistro of sorts” – all three take cues from long-standing conventions and re-cast them with fun and clever but absolutely serious takes on the source material. FTCer @mzonelli wrote in the “May 2025 Rundown” thread that the Big Baby, as I’ve been calling it lately, is a “type of restaurant LA is desperately in need of - creative, unpretentious, accessible, but feels new.”

I’ll echo a lot of that here: The cookery is creative, and it isn’t flashy, fusiony, made-for-Instagram-or-Tik-Tokky. We might debate the level of pretension and accessibility (compared to who or what; on what ground; accessible in terms of concept, taste, and/or price? I’ll come back to that…), but the restaurant absolutely feels new.

My take is long overdue, as I had a lot of ideas right after my visit there in May. I was reminded of them on my MTL eating weekend, where I almost ate exclusively at bistros and wine bars (of sorts).

Like those establishments, Baby Bistro solicits the inviting and warm atmosphere of a neighborhood spot by the tone of its venue: A renovated Victorian-style home done up in a warm-toned wood conspicuously absent of hard corners and lines, austere concrete surfaces, and too-loud music presented either through furniture-grade audio components or concealed speakers. Indeed, the volume level inside of the restaurant was two ticks above hushed, even as we slinked by the pass into the semi-private dining room nearest the back patio.

Benches run along the walls, accommodating about ten diners total, depending on the party at the largest table, which is where my girlfriend and I were sat. Presented with the menu, I almost felt confronted by its brevity – @PeonyWarrior’s photo from the May 2025 thread suffices, as it’s nearly identical to June’s menu.

“Turnip, tofu”? What did that look like? How did those two ingredients mingle? I understood the kind of service here was to be collaborative, conversational with the server, but I was reaching for a little bit more data to help me situate what I was about to order. As we were to rely on our server almost solely for expectations, the advisement here circled rather than led; we did get more details about some of the dishes, which enticed us – the tofu was silken from Meiji; noodle-width strips of squid mixed with cucumber. But we had no idea about the sauce on the fish, nor the portion of the special or the steak.

I’ll come back to my qualms with the menu, but for now, let us proceed with the food. We were prepared to order the whole menu, and that we did and then some: We opted for the special that night, too, which was a sausage affair.

Skipping the wine pairing (which may have been a mistake for the bill), seven dishes for two seemed a plenty good amount of food, maybe too much.

Onion Bread · Country Terrine

Wish I’d written this earlier so I’d remember the sauce underneath the broccolini, because that was the best thing on this menu. We did skip the liptauer because of my lactose intolerance, much to the compromise of my girlfriend, who is a cheese fiend. Bread: ok, served plain; would have been nice with the steak, but on its own, some kind of low-commitment spread would have been nice. Country terrine: Fatty. Nice.

Turnip, tofu · Cucumber, squid

Turnip and tofu didn’t land with me; the tofu and lightly tart and sweet raspberries in the sauce were playing nicely on their own, and while I appreciated the concept, but the turnip was very misplaced for me. Maybe my sense-memory was running up against tofu and the heavy western-style, cumin-forward pickling flavor on the turnip, but I wasn’t taken with this one.

In this spot in the meal, the cucumber & squid was the best thing. Top 3 of the dinner next to the special and the steak. Seasoning was spot on and the play on East Asian profiles and combinations was fun. But I thought the squid was cut too inconsistently. The treatment on the squid alone was probably better than the steak.

Special: House-made lamb chorizo sausage · Sea Bass


In total we’re having three mains; the special was likely a step too far portion-wise. But I loved the special, much more so than the sea bass, whose sauce was too heavy-handed: It was almost like it had too much hoisin. Of course sea bass could take it, but I don’t remember the actual fish having a lot of work done to it to play with the sauce. Could be wrong.

Break, and a note about plate service

We’ve got one more before dessert comes, and we appreciated the breather in the eating. But I’d like to take this opportunity here to note that we would have really appreciated new plates after the fish. Our small dinner plates were completely sauced up. You might say the whole idea is to get in there and mix all the sauces up and go ham, but we didn’t feel invited to do that – Baby Bistro is pared down and laid back, but also dressed up; creative and attentive in execution and concept, but also nonchalant. These kinds of dualities run through the decor, the service affect, and the entire personality of the restaurant. So much work goes into the sauces I really thought it a shame to just swirl it around on my plate with the dregs of finished dishes.

Coulotte steak

Great protein here, and that brothy sauce was super savory and delicious. Loved the touch on the wood ears. I would have absolutely been bummed to have missed this had I known in advance about the wood ears.

Dessert: Pine nut, rhubarb

Exceedingly attractive pine-nut cookie, but when it came out to the table, I cocked my head. “Rhubarb?” There was more cookie and cream than rhubarb, and the sweetness overwhelmed any notes of it that might have been running through it. My girlfriend liked it much more than I, but thought the amount of pine nuts in the cookie was excessive. She has also reminded me that my recollection was not hers, and that I actually really liked the cream topping.

Final thoughts
I’m glad Baby Bistro is here, and we had a very, very good meal, and having ordered everything the first time here, I know I’ll feel less trepidation skipping some dishes and perhaps ordering two of other.

At dinner’s end, I had three main contentions: The menu, the sauce, and, I admit this just might have been an oversight, diner attention.

  1. Menu woes. I hope this style of menu writing will be updated and revised as the restaurant continues to develop. Too-vague descriptions, and the almost arbitrariness of the add ons, works against helping diners make decisions that they might feel will be worth their studying efforts and wallets. One could imagine someone ordering everything almost out of fear that they’d miss out on something that was truly special. Without some more description, it’s hard to conceptualize what we’re working with, so it feels less like we can sub than we ought to follow the restaurant’s advisement to order it all. Chef Miles Thompson has insisted it’s not a tasting menu, a point echoed by our server, and we got an affected acquiescent nod when we asked about “substitutes.” So, it’s laid back, but the best way to do it is to order everything; it’s not a tasting menu, and you can sub, but it really isn’t a sub if it’s not a tasting menu or prix fixe, but the menu’s been sequented in such a way that has a narrative, so there’s the undercurrent of possibly disrespecting the chef and restaurant’s concept on the whole if you do. So, a prix fixe, but not really, and we could sub if we want, but only if we wanted to. From multiple non-committal angles, diners could be encouraged to order it all, and quietly discouraged from going their own way. The soft-edged communication here was more confounding than annoying. But to that: We dropped a good amount of cash with drinks and food here, so while the flavors might be accessible, prices less so.

  2. Plate service. Couldn’t tell you how many times I got new plates in Montreal; there were maybe three changes. Baby Bistro could do with at least one switch-out to account for extra saucy affairs.

  3. Allergy check-in. Total nitpick, and I’m sure this isn’t a regular thing: We made the reservation online, and I’d noted my girlfriend’s allergies. These weren’t verified by either the host or our server throughout our time here.

Would love to come back once there’s a bit more variety in the menu, and I’m eager to see where the team will take this exciting addition to Los Angeles dining.

19 Likes

Have you just asked them to change the plate - that’s what we tend to do when a restaurant is s bit slow/reluctant to change them ?

4 Likes

love this paragraph, totally get it

1 Like

We did indeed, but I bring it up because asking for it misses the point. Maybe I’m expecting too much, but so many other dimensions were precisely configured that a new plate seemed to be within the realm of reasonable expectation when the quality of cookery, the idiosyncrasies of the menu, and the personalized service seemed to be more or less calibrated to a high performance degree.

4 Likes

Yeah I chalk it up to them getting into their groove still. It’s a new(er) spot.

I hear you on the menu explanations of the dishes, but I don’t mind asking for details on the dishes if I need to decide if I’m not going to fire the whole menu. Plus we got in depth explanations of everything as they hit the table. With only 5-6 dishes it doesn’t bother me at all - but I can see how some would just want everything laid out for them to decide.

And on firing the whole menu - believe they just recommend the top portion and the bottom are extras - if you get them ALL including the bottom it does become a more expensive meal but we just did one and 2 drinks each and walked out of there at 110pp after tax and tip which for the amount of different dishes we had feels like a steal in LA.

4 Likes

We did 7, with one swap from add on (terrine for the liptauer), plus the chorizo special, and about two drinks each. After tax and tip i think we were closer to 150pp, maybe a little more.

About the explanations: the menu identifies “country terrine” as only that. But the sauce underneath the broccolini was stupendous; while I was pleasantly surprised, I wondered why even the brocc was omitted from the title. Would it not help expedite service times a bit? We tried to stay within the recommended portion for 2 and negotiate my dietary restriction, and more written detail could help with the calculus when we’re not the only table in a server’s section

3 Likes

Guessing the veggie side of the terrine changes more than the terrine itself so it’s an easier thing to VO and avoid reprints or be a little surprise moment for the diner. You still got it, so the terrine description did the job!

But full disclosure I hate overly long menu descriptions so maybe it’s a me thing

I don’t need an essay, nor an exhaustive list of every single ingredient in the sauce; appreciate the BOH perspective, so why not at least append “market veg” or some other variant of that to the title? Comprehensive descriptions when delivered are fine but I’m often straining to follow them once placed. Maybe just me.

The omission could introduce another pain point w/r/t to allergies. Again, I don’t believe my experience is representative of the team’s standards of procedure, but the surprise moment for the diner could have instantly turned into a return and swap for something else. That the description “did the job” seems a circumstantial result more than an intentional one, from my end.

2 Likes

I feel you and again I’d say - they opened in May, you went in May. The allergy thing is real, the descriptions feel like an overthink

2 Likes

Appreciate your engagement!

2 Likes

Back atcha

1 Like

Similar experience to yours @avantbored. Highlights were squid, terrine, and the space. Agree with @mzonelli about value.

Found the service friendly and in keeping with the loose vibe but also diffident and at times distracted. Kinda matches the menu. They also flubbed a not super important allergy/intolerance (egg) with the dessert, but comped it.

The sweet vinegar on the tofu turnip overpowered the dish for me, though I liked the idea of raspberries. Mains/larger dishes were a miss too: prawns puttanesca, fine but not especially interesting or different than I’d do at home. *The other main, not ordered, was a chicken sausage over job’s tears. Maybe the menu didn’t do it justice idk…

Would return, feels very only in LA restaurant, but also think, having eaten his food before, there’s more potential.

6 Likes

To be fair I feel the same way about how the menu reads. This isn’t the only reserved description a la carte menu I’ve seen, and even in tasting menu formats I’ve had good and bad experiences with being too dependent on the tastes/attitudes of the server

Trust in the kitchen doesn’t always translate to trust in the FOH

Like to order a bottle for the meal, now you’re dependent on the servers description/interpretation of multiple dishes

That said I loved Thompsons’s food at Michael’s

5 Likes

@ShadrackToussaint yeah he does have more juice in him - I think it’ll get there.

And that’s fair on the FOH part - especially for tasting menus where they’re usually quite elaborate preps and you might not get to hear the nuances. Sometimes I feel like you get what you put in as a diner if you act/show curiosity and sometimes even if you do - you aren’t rewarded with a deeper dive. You’re right that it depends on the person @butteredwaffles

3 Likes

An aside that’ll probably get me moved to another thread - all the perceptive and good natured people on this board - do you give feedback to the restaurant? Are you hoping they’ll find this thread by actively looking for feedback? I try to be as constructive as possible in the moment to FOH or the chef if I have a relationship - feels like there is some relevant feedback to give to the spot here if you feel strongly it’ll make the place better.

4 Likes

I admit i didnt search the forum before i thought to reply: Good idea for a non-regional thread! I know a buddy of mine who was also at the Baby and knows the team somewhat asked about the menu brevity and maybe one other thing. I guess the relationship is key there

1 Like

Interesting question, almost never, with the exception of salt levels, which feels safe and close to objective! Honestly I bring those feelings/opinions to this forum.

I find elements of contemporary dining to be a power struggle between restaurant and diner. Don’t feel like I have the standing to say tell Miles the turnip dish doesn’t work (not enough tofu, too much vinegar) or to tell say Brian at Dunsmoor that the cornbread is out of balance, missing the sour element, and not anything like the stuff I grew up on in the Lowcountry. Btw I know few agree with me about the cornbread.

It’s tricky, why would a restaurant listen to some random schmuck like me lol? They have no way to index my taste, and everyone on the internet is a hater.

Anyway it’s an interesting question, one I think about for restaurants that have potential or I want to succeed!

PS - Thought about this a lot at my recent meal at Kabawa in NYC.

6 Likes

oh man, this thread is so getting moved but was Kabawa not that great? I want to go solely for the rum program.

2 Likes

Totally - I usually only do it if I’m acquainted with them or if something terribly out of balance. Minor dish gripes vs fundamental things (like the menu detail suggestion) are different levels of feedback too. Sometimes I leave it in the resy feedback tool as I know a lot of restaurant owner friends check that. Sometimes if something is egregious I send a nice email later

5 Likes

Incisive, and certainly resonates with what I was trying to get at with the whole a la carte/tasting/prix fixe menu thing above. How much acquiescence do I have to supply, and contingent to that amount, am I then obliged to just feel ashamed about my taste if I didn’t agree – as in, I guess I must not be a part of an elite cadre who just gets it.

I am very grateful that a venue such as FTC exists because, indeed, people here are enthusiastic and good-natured and it is devoid of the kind of shmuckery I see on my vertically-oriented, algorithm-based spaces, either in the form of unbridled enthusiasm, excessive attention to “the vibe,” or a cheap veil for an affiliate marketing post. This forum reminds me a lot of the kind of enthusiastic internet I cut my teeth on that prizes exchange and conversation more than virtual commercial real estate.

This scenario is a good example, too, because I have no connection to the team there, and the idea of hailing a server down to ask to speak to the manager, or just get the manager, and make complaints seems unnecessarily grand when one is sharing the dining room with others just trying to have a good time. I’ve only done Dunsmoor once and I wasn’t taken with the cornbread. Is the source material really so sweet? Anyway…

That’s great to know through you that such Resy feedback is actually consumed! I’ll definitely take the opportunity the next time it arises.

6 Likes